Kyrgyzstan vs Suriname: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Suriname
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 8.25 kg/ha against 8.18 kg/ha in Suriname, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Suriname ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 56th and Suriname ranks 57th of 185 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.01 kg/ha | 5.57 kg/ha | 0.5592 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2000s | 4.9 kg/ha | 6.61 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 6.89 kg/ha | 7.07 kg/ha | 0.1786 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2020s | 8.07 kg/ha | 8.35 kg/ha | 0.2888 kg/ha | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Suriname?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 8.25 kg/ha against 8.18 kg/ha in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Suriname?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Suriname?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Suriname rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 56th and Suriname ranks 57th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).