Latvia vs Madagascar: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 3.37 kg/ha against 3.33 kg/ha in Madagascar, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 110th and Madagascar ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.61 kg/ha | 2.55 kg/ha | 4.06 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 4.85 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | 2.95 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 3.96 kg/ha | 2.68 kg/ha | 1.28 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 3.55 kg/ha | 3.12 kg/ha | 0.435 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Latvia or Madagascar?
- Latvia, at 3.37 kg/ha against 3.33 kg/ha in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Latvia and Madagascar?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Madagascar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Madagascar rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 110th and Madagascar ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).