Libya vs Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Libya
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.7242 kg/ha against 0.6137 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.1105 kg/ha.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 192nd and Sudan ranks 190th of 200 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5791 kg/ha | 0.745 kg/ha | 0.1659 kg/ha | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.6002 kg/ha | 0.7285 kg/ha | 0.1283 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Libya or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.7242 kg/ha against 0.6137 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Libya and Sudan?
- 0.1105 kg/ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Libya ranks 192nd and Sudan ranks 190th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).