Mauritius vs Slovakia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Mauritius
- Slovakia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 4.46 kg/ha against 4.29 kg/ha in Slovakia, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 108th of 200 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.84 kg/ha | 9.34 kg/ha | 7.5 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 2.66 kg/ha | 6.95 kg/ha | 4.29 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 4 kg/ha | 5.16 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 4.43 kg/ha | 4.43 kg/ha | 0.003 kg/ha | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Mauritius or Slovakia?
- Mauritius, at 4.46 kg/ha against 4.29 kg/ha in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Mauritius and Slovakia?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Slovakia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Mauritius ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 108th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).