Saudi Arabia vs Ukraine: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 1.6 kg/ha against 1.58 kg/ha in Ukraine, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 159th and Ukraine ranks 160th of 200 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6763 kg/ha | 5.85 kg/ha | 5.17 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 0.9419 kg/ha | 3.06 kg/ha | 2.11 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 1.32 kg/ha | 2.33 kg/ha | 1 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 1.58 kg/ha | 1.81 kg/ha | 0.2343 kg/ha | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Saudi Arabia or Ukraine?
- Saudi Arabia, at 1.6 kg/ha against 1.58 kg/ha in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Saudi Arabia and Ukraine?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Ukraine rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 159th and Ukraine ranks 160th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).