Sudan vs Tunisia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Sudan
0.7242 kg/ha
in 2023
Tunisia
0.7392 kg/ha
in 2023
Sudan rank
190th
Tunisia rank
189th

Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Sudan
  • Tunisia
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.7392 kg/ha against 0.7242 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.015 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 190th and Tunisia ranks 189th of 200 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Tunisia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.745 kg/ha 0.6671 kg/ha 0.078 kg/ha Sudan
2020s 0.7285 kg/ha 0.7277 kg/ha 0.0008 kg/ha Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Sudan or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.7392 kg/ha against 0.7242 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Sudan and Tunisia?
0.015 kg/ha, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Tunisia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Tunisia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Sudan ranks 190th and Tunisia ranks 189th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).