Albania vs El Salvador: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Albania
- El Salvador
How they compare
Albania currently reports 4,722 t against 4,298 t in El Salvador, a difference of 424 t.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Albania has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 106th and El Salvador ranks 108th of 185 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,634 t | 3,014 t | 1,620 t | Albania |
| 1970s | 5,081 t | 3,582 t | 1,499 t | Albania |
| 1980s | 6,996 t | 3,332 t | 3,664 t | Albania |
| 1990s | 8,412 t | 3,250 t | 5,162 t | Albania |
| 2000s | 8,483 t | 4,072 t | 4,411 t | Albania |
| 2010s | 7,494 t | 3,682 t | 3,812 t | Albania |
| 2020s | 5,434 t | 4,301 t | 1,133 t | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Albania or El Salvador?
- Albania, at 4,722 t against 4,298 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Albania and El Salvador?
- 424 t, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and El Salvador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Albania and El Salvador rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Albania ranks 106th and El Salvador ranks 108th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).