Algeria vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Algeria
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 5,822 t against 5,754 t in Algeria, a difference of 68 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 104th and Saudi Arabia ranks 103rd of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 6 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 830.02 t | 111.79 t | 718.24 t | Algeria |
| 1970s | 1,213 t | 320.41 t | 892.79 t | Algeria |
| 1980s | 2,197 t | 1,425 t | 772.88 t | Algeria |
| 1990s | 2,939 t | 2,460 t | 478.55 t | Algeria |
| 2000s | 3,769 t | 3,558 t | 211.58 t | Algeria |
| 2010s | 4,917 t | 4,838 t | 79.2 t | Algeria |
| 2020s | 5,648 t | 5,748 t | 99.5 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Algeria or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 5,822 t against 5,754 t in Algeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Algeria and Saudi Arabia?
- 68 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Algeria and Saudi Arabia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Algeria ranks 104th and Saudi Arabia ranks 103rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).