Angola vs Czechia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus

Angola
16,011 t
in 2023
Czechia
16,712 t
in 2023
Angola rank
63rd
Czechia rank
61st

Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Angola
  • Czechia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 16,712 t against 16,011 t in Angola, a difference of 701 t.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 63rd and Czechia ranks 61st of 200 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Czechia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,956 t 31,012 t 27,056 t Czechia
2000s 5,592 t 23,299 t 17,707 t Czechia
2010s 11,731 t 17,734 t 6,003 t Czechia
2020s 14,666 t 16,487 t 1,820 t Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Angola or Czechia?
Czechia, at 16,712 t against 16,011 t in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Angola and Czechia?
701 t, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Czechia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Angola and Czechia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
Angola ranks 63rd and Czechia ranks 61st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).