Angola vs Ecuador: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Angola
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 17,850 t against 16,011 t in Angola, a difference of 1,839 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 55th and Ecuador ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,693 t | 9,199 t | 7,507 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 2,338 t | 13,995 t | 11,657 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 3,533 t | 16,384 t | 12,851 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 3,937 t | 18,230 t | 14,293 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 5,592 t | 18,088 t | 12,497 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 11,731 t | 19,325 t | 7,594 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 14,666 t | 17,902 t | 3,235 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Angola or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 17,850 t against 16,011 t in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Angola and Ecuador?
- 1,839 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Ecuador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Ecuador rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Angola ranks 55th and Ecuador ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).