Angola vs Serbia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus

Angola
16,011 t
in 2023
Serbia
15,132 t
in 2023
Angola rank
63rd
Serbia rank
66th

Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Angola
  • Serbia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 16,011 t against 15,132 t in Serbia, a difference of 879 t.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Angola ranks 63rd and Serbia ranks 66th of 200 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 6,855 t 23,103 t 16,248 t Serbia
2010s 11,731 t 20,240 t 8,509 t Serbia
2020s 14,666 t 17,550 t 2,884 t Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Angola or Serbia?
Angola, at 16,011 t against 15,132 t in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Angola and Serbia?
879 t, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Angola and Serbia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
Angola ranks 63rd and Serbia ranks 66th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).