Argentina vs Denmark: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Argentina
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 42,819 t against 39,572 t in Argentina, a difference of 3,247 t.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 36th and Denmark ranks 33rd of 200 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31,465 t | 48,758 t | 17,294 t | Denmark |
| 1970s | 35,633 t | 45,987 t | 10,354 t | Denmark |
| 1980s | 36,912 t | 45,449 t | 8,536 t | Denmark |
| 1990s | 31,318 t | 45,684 t | 14,366 t | Denmark |
| 2000s | 28,286 t | 48,041 t | 19,754 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 36,467 t | 46,528 t | 10,060 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 38,330 t | 45,788 t | 7,458 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Argentina or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 42,819 t against 39,572 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Argentina and Denmark?
- 3,247 t, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Denmark?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Denmark rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Argentina ranks 36th and Denmark ranks 33rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).