Armenia vs Jordan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Armenia
- Jordan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 1,085 t against 1,080 t in Jordan, a difference of 5 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 146th and Jordan ranks 148th of 200 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 740.11 t | 618.8 t | 121.31 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 811.42 t | 685.28 t | 126.14 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 1,020 t | 845.65 t | 173.89 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 1,164 t | 1,033 t | 131.45 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Armenia or Jordan?
- Armenia, at 1,085 t against 1,080 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Armenia and Jordan?
- 5 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Jordan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Jordan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Armenia ranks 146th and Jordan ranks 148th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).