Armenia vs Libya: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Armenia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 1,258 t against 1,085 t in Armenia, a difference of 173 t.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 146th and Libya ranks 143rd of 200 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 740.11 t | 773.48 t | 33.36 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 811.42 t | 929.57 t | 118.14 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 1,020 t | 1,185 t | 165.18 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 1,164 t | 1,230 t | 65.96 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Armenia or Libya?
- Libya, at 1,258 t against 1,085 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Armenia and Libya?
- 173 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Libya rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Armenia ranks 146th and Libya ranks 143rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).