Austria vs Malaysia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Austria
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 22,659 t against 19,853 t in Austria, a difference of 2,806 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 46th and Malaysia ranks 44th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 6 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,385 t | 5,148 t | 23,237 t | Austria |
| 1970s | 30,215 t | 6,945 t | 23,270 t | Austria |
| 1980s | 31,574 t | 9,288 t | 22,286 t | Austria |
| 1990s | 28,710 t | 11,753 t | 16,957 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 24,765 t | 15,987 t | 8,778 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 23,104 t | 20,981 t | 2,123 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 20,893 t | 22,141 t | 1,248 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Austria or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 22,659 t against 19,853 t in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Austria and Malaysia?
- 2,806 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Malaysia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Malaysia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Austria ranks 46th and Malaysia ranks 44th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).