Bahamas vs Malta: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bahamas
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 231.7 t against 176.1 t in Bahamas, a difference of 55.6 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times Bahamas's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 180th and Malta ranks 177th of 200 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 81.1 t | 220.59 t | 139.49 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 84.38 t | 320.68 t | 236.3 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 97.19 t | 474.34 t | 377.15 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 139.53 t | 556.41 t | 416.88 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 156.69 t | 522.99 t | 366.3 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 168.68 t | 348.93 t | 180.25 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 175.62 t | 258.12 t | 82.5 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Bahamas or Malta?
- Malta, at 231.7 t against 176.1 t in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Bahamas and Malta?
- 55.6 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Malta rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Bahamas ranks 180th and Malta ranks 177th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).