Belarus vs Middle Africa: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belarus
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Middle Africa currently reports 51,771 t against 46,032 t in Belarus, a difference of 5,739 t.
That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 29th and Middle Africa ranks 26th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Middle Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 52,451 t | 21,289 t | 31,162 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 41,048 t | 27,563 t | 13,485 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 46,590 t | 41,189 t | 5,400 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 45,818 t | 49,066 t | 3,248 t | Middle Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Belarus or Middle Africa?
- Middle Africa, at 51,771 t against 46,032 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Belarus and Middle Africa?
- 5,739 t, with Middle Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Middle Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Middle Africa rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Belarus ranks 29th and Middle Africa ranks 26th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).