Belarus vs Western Asia: Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belarus
- Western Asia
How they compare
Western Asia currently reports 49,011 t against 46,032 t in Belarus, a difference of 2,979 t.
That makes Western Asia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 29th and Western Asia ranks 27th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Western Asia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Western Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 52,451 t | 29,986 t | 22,465 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 41,048 t | 35,303 t | 5,745 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 46,590 t | 41,981 t | 4,609 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 45,818 t | 49,649 t | 3,831 t | Western Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland phosphorus, Belarus or Western Asia?
- Western Asia, at 49,011 t against 46,032 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland phosphorus between Belarus and Western Asia?
- 2,979 t, with Western Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Western Asia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Western Asia rank globally for manure applied β cropland phosphorus?
- Belarus ranks 29th and Western Asia ranks 27th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).