Belgium vs Malawi: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus

Belgium
30,493 t
in 2023
Malawi
35,208 t
in 2023
Belgium rank
43rd
Malawi rank
41st

Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Belgium
  • Malawi
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 35,208 t against 30,493 t in Belgium, a difference of 4,715 t.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 43rd and Malawi ranks 41st of 200 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 34,982 t 3,226 t 31,756 t Belgium
2010s 33,079 t 14,787 t 18,293 t Belgium
2020s 32,099 t 31,744 t 355.05 t Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Belgium or Malawi?
Malawi, at 35,208 t against 30,493 t in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Belgium and Malawi?
4,715 t, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Malawi?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Malawi rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
Belgium ranks 43rd and Malawi ranks 41st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).