Bulgaria vs Costa Rica: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bulgaria
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 8,467 t against 7,485 t in Bulgaria, a difference of 982 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Bulgaria's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 82nd and Costa Rica ranks 80th of 184 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 6 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29,199 t | 1,835 t | 27,364 t | Bulgaria |
| 1970s | 32,607 t | 2,765 t | 29,841 t | Bulgaria |
| 1980s | 37,100 t | 3,200 t | 33,901 t | Bulgaria |
| 1990s | 20,930 t | 4,498 t | 16,433 t | Bulgaria |
| 2000s | 11,869 t | 6,086 t | 5,783 t | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 8,980 t | 7,687 t | 1,293 t | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 7,967 t | 8,002 t | 35.91 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Bulgaria or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 8,467 t against 7,485 t in Bulgaria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Bulgaria and Costa Rica?
- 982 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Costa Rica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Costa Rica rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Bulgaria ranks 82nd and Costa Rica ranks 80th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).