Burkina Faso vs Cuba: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Burkina Faso
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 10,533 t against 10,026 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 507 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 84th and Cuba ranks 82nd of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,338 t | 10,354 t | 9,016 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 1,634 t | 10,664 t | 9,030 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 2,960 t | 11,970 t | 9,010 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 5,359 t | 12,012 t | 6,653 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 10,140 t | 10,853 t | 712.72 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 13,166 t | 11,450 t | 1,716 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 10,041 t | 9,082 t | 959.14 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Burkina Faso or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 10,533 t against 10,026 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Burkina Faso and Cuba?
- 507 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Cuba rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Burkina Faso ranks 84th and Cuba ranks 82nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).