Burkina Faso vs South Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Burkina Faso
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 10,109 t against 10,026 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 83 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 77th and South Sudan ranks 76th of 185 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13,437 t | 8,856 t | 4,581 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 10,041 t | 9,925 t | 115.68 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Burkina Faso or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 10,109 t against 10,026 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Burkina Faso and South Sudan?
- 83 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and South Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Burkina Faso ranks 77th and South Sudan ranks 76th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).