Cambodia vs Chile: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cambodia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 16,182 t against 15,213 t in Cambodia, a difference of 969 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 65th and Chile ranks 62nd of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 6 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,852 t | 5,576 t | 4,276 t | Cambodia |
| 1970s | 8,833 t | 6,599 t | 2,235 t | Cambodia |
| 1980s | 8,766 t | 7,161 t | 1,605 t | Cambodia |
| 1990s | 14,855 t | 11,788 t | 3,067 t | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 17,511 t | 15,703 t | 1,808 t | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 16,763 t | 16,418 t | 345.22 t | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 15,626 t | 16,384 t | 757.35 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Cambodia or Chile?
- Chile, at 16,182 t against 15,213 t in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Cambodia and Chile?
- 969 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Chile?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Chile rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Cambodia ranks 65th and Chile ranks 62nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).