Canada vs Czechoslovakia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Canada
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 67,163 t against 60,563 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 6,600 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Czechoslovakia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 19th and Czechoslovakia ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Czechoslovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 60,674 t | 55,354 t | 5,320 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 59,954 t | 59,687 t | 266.37 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 60,503 t | 67,139 t | 6,637 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 58,789 t | 65,018 t | 6,229 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Canada or Czechoslovakia?
- Canada, at 67,163 t against 60,563 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Canada and Czechoslovakia?
- 6,600 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Canada and Czechoslovakia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Canada ranks 19th and Czechoslovakia ranks 22nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).