Caribbean vs Kazakhstan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Caribbean
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 40,168 t against 37,521 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2,647 t.
That makes Caribbean's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Caribbean ranks 34th and Kazakhstan ranks 37th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27,633 t | 43,066 t | 15,434 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 32,744 t | 30,193 t | 2,551 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 36,378 t | 37,241 t | 862.72 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 37,930 t | 37,305 t | 624.9 t | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Caribbean or Kazakhstan?
- Caribbean, at 40,168 t against 37,521 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Caribbean and Kazakhstan?
- 2,647 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Kazakhstan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Caribbean ranks 34th and Kazakhstan ranks 37th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).