Chad vs Switzerland: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Chad
- Switzerland
How they compare
Chad currently reports 13,356 t against 12,559 t in Switzerland, a difference of 797 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.
Chad ranks 71st and Switzerland ranks 73rd of 200 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,296 t | 15,143 t | 13,847 t | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 1,255 t | 16,678 t | 15,423 t | Switzerland |
| 1980s | 1,682 t | 16,354 t | 14,671 t | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 2,726 t | 14,374 t | 11,648 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 4,737 t | 13,285 t | 8,548 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 8,369 t | 12,997 t | 4,628 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 12,283 t | 12,590 t | 307.12 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Chad or Switzerland?
- Chad, at 13,356 t against 12,559 t in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Chad and Switzerland?
- 797 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Switzerland rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Chad ranks 71st and Switzerland ranks 73rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).