Chile vs Ecuador: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Chile
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 17,850 t against 16,182 t in Chile, a difference of 1,668 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Chile ranks 62nd and Ecuador ranks 59th of 200 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,576 t | 9,199 t | 3,623 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 6,599 t | 13,995 t | 7,396 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 7,161 t | 16,384 t | 9,223 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 11,788 t | 18,230 t | 6,443 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 15,703 t | 18,088 t | 2,385 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 16,418 t | 19,325 t | 2,907 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 16,384 t | 17,902 t | 1,518 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Chile or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 17,850 t against 16,182 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Chile and Ecuador?
- 1,668 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Chile ranks 62nd and Ecuador ranks 59th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).