Congo vs Lesotho: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Congo
- Lesotho
How they compare
Congo currently reports 510.64 t against 396.75 t in Lesotho, a difference of 113.89 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Congo ranks 160th and Lesotho ranks 163rd of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 111.79 t | 430.84 t | 319.05 t | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 178.63 t | 529.2 t | 350.57 t | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 185.81 t | 522.62 t | 336.81 t | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 248.54 t | 526.07 t | 277.53 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 339.7 t | 786.08 t | 446.38 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 478.52 t | 550.41 t | 71.89 t | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 505.69 t | 395.48 t | 110.21 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Congo or Lesotho?
- Congo, at 510.64 t against 396.75 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Congo and Lesotho?
- 113.89 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Lesotho rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Congo ranks 160th and Lesotho ranks 163rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).