Croatia vs Norway: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Croatia
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 5,689 t against 5,518 t in Croatia, a difference of 171 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 108th and Norway ranks 105th of 200 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,132 t | 5,874 t | 2,258 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 7,574 t | 5,845 t | 1,730 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 6,700 t | 5,832 t | 867.48 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 5,978 t | 5,781 t | 197.02 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Croatia or Norway?
- Norway, at 5,689 t against 5,518 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Croatia and Norway?
- 171 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Norway?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Norway rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Croatia ranks 108th and Norway ranks 105th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).