Cuba vs Finland: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cuba
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 11,182 t against 10,533 t in Cuba, a difference of 649 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Cuba ranks 82nd and Finland ranks 79th of 200 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,354 t | 21,968 t | 11,614 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 10,664 t | 20,497 t | 9,833 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 11,970 t | 18,573 t | 6,603 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 12,012 t | 15,039 t | 3,027 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 10,853 t | 13,196 t | 2,343 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 11,450 t | 12,177 t | 726.45 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 9,082 t | 11,245 t | 2,163 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Cuba or Finland?
- Finland, at 11,182 t against 10,533 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Cuba and Finland?
- 649 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Finland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Finland rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Cuba ranks 82nd and Finland ranks 79th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).