Cuba vs South Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cuba
- South Sudan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 10,533 t against 10,109 t in South Sudan, a difference of 424 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 82nd and South Sudan ranks 83rd of 200 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11,675 t | 8,856 t | 2,820 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 9,082 t | 9,925 t | 843.46 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Cuba or South Sudan?
- Cuba, at 10,533 t against 10,109 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Cuba and South Sudan?
- 424 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and South Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Cuba ranks 82nd and South Sudan ranks 83rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).