Cyprus vs Eritrea: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cyprus
- Eritrea
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 1,196 t against 1,082 t in Eritrea, a difference of 114 t.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 144th and Eritrea ranks 147th of 200 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,614 t | 609.16 t | 1,005 t | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 1,830 t | 897.07 t | 932.63 t | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 1,508 t | 1,040 t | 468.51 t | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 1,341 t | 1,081 t | 259.68 t | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Cyprus or Eritrea?
- Cyprus, at 1,196 t against 1,082 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Cyprus and Eritrea?
- 114 t, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Eritrea rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Cyprus ranks 144th and Eritrea ranks 147th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).