Czechia vs Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechia
- Sudan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 16,712 t against 15,362 t in Sudan, a difference of 1,350 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 61st and Sudan ranks 64th of 200 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17,615 t | 15,292 t | 2,323 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 16,487 t | 15,452 t | 1,035 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Sudan?
- Czechia, at 16,712 t against 15,362 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Sudan?
- 1,350 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechia ranks 61st and Sudan ranks 64th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).