Czechoslovakia vs Western Africa: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Western Africa
How they compare
Western Africa currently reports 114,531 t against 60,563 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 53,968 t.
That makes Western Africa's figure about 1.9 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 24th and Western Africa ranks 24th of 200 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Western Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 55,354 t | 18,169 t | 37,185 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 59,687 t | 23,699 t | 35,989 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 67,139 t | 33,209 t | 33,930 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 65,018 t | 45,139 t | 19,879 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Czechoslovakia or Western Africa?
- Western Africa, at 114,531 t against 60,563 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Czechoslovakia and Western Africa?
- 53,968 t, with Western Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Western Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Western Africa rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 24th and Western Africa ranks 24th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).