Denmark vs Thailand: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Denmark
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 45,263 t against 42,819 t in Denmark, a difference of 2,444 t.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 33rd and Thailand ranks 30th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and Thailand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 48,758 t | 37,959 t | 10,799 t | Denmark |
| 1970s | 45,987 t | 41,701 t | 4,286 t | Denmark |
| 1980s | 45,449 t | 46,151 t | 702.85 t | Thailand |
| 1990s | 45,684 t | 52,395 t | 6,711 t | Thailand |
| 2000s | 48,041 t | 47,668 t | 372.48 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 46,528 t | 46,635 t | 107.7 t | Thailand |
| 2020s | 45,788 t | 45,303 t | 485.05 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Denmark or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 45,263 t against 42,819 t in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Denmark and Thailand?
- 2,444 t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Thailand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Thailand rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Denmark ranks 33rd and Thailand ranks 30th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).