Djibouti vs Dominica: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Djibouti
- Dominica
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 118.64 t against 78.38 t in Dominica, a difference of 40.26 t.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.5 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Djibouti ranks 170th and Dominica ranks 172nd of 184 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 6 and Dominica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36.34 t | 37.71 t | 1.37 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 49.35 t | 43.88 t | 5.47 t | Djibouti |
| 1980s | 72.57 t | 57.21 t | 15.36 t | Djibouti |
| 1990s | 101.61 t | 72.86 t | 28.76 t | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 114.77 t | 75.13 t | 39.64 t | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 116.82 t | 78.31 t | 38.52 t | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 118.32 t | 78.2 t | 40.12 t | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Djibouti or Dominica?
- Djibouti, at 118.64 t against 78.38 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Djibouti and Dominica?
- 40.26 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Dominica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Dominica rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Djibouti ranks 170th and Dominica ranks 172nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).