Djibouti vs Kiribati: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Djibouti
- Kiribati
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 118.64 t against 99.89 t in Kiribati, a difference of 18.75 t.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.
Djibouti ranks 185th and Kiribati ranks 186th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 6 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36.34 t | 38.65 t | 2.31 t | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 49.35 t | 41.81 t | 7.55 t | Djibouti |
| 1980s | 72.57 t | 46.1 t | 26.47 t | Djibouti |
| 1990s | 101.61 t | 51.32 t | 50.29 t | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 114.77 t | 76.09 t | 38.68 t | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 116.82 t | 93.25 t | 23.58 t | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 118.32 t | 99.16 t | 19.16 t | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Djibouti or Kiribati?
- Djibouti, at 118.64 t against 99.89 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Djibouti and Kiribati?
- 18.75 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Kiribati rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Djibouti ranks 185th and Kiribati ranks 186th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).