Dominica vs Kiribati: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Dominica
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 99.89 t against 78.38 t in Dominica, a difference of 21.51 t.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.3 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 187th and Kiribati ranks 186th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 3 and Kiribati in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37.71 t | 38.65 t | 0.9436 t | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 43.88 t | 41.81 t | 2.08 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 57.21 t | 46.1 t | 11.11 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 72.86 t | 51.32 t | 21.54 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 75.13 t | 76.09 t | 0.965 t | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 78.31 t | 93.25 t | 14.94 t | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 78.2 t | 99.16 t | 20.96 t | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Dominica or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 99.89 t against 78.38 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Dominica and Kiribati?
- 21.51 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Kiribati rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Dominica ranks 187th and Kiribati ranks 186th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).