Dominican Republic vs Portugal: Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Dominican Republic
- Portugal
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 18,511 t against 18,003 t in Portugal, a difference of 508 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 49th and Portugal ranks 51st of 184 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,348 t | 16,220 t | 11,872 t | Portugal |
| 1970s | 4,800 t | 18,600 t | 13,800 t | Portugal |
| 1980s | 4,024 t | 24,237 t | 20,214 t | Portugal |
| 1990s | 6,492 t | 22,995 t | 16,503 t | Portugal |
| 2000s | 11,038 t | 21,634 t | 10,595 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 13,889 t | 21,240 t | 7,351 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 17,708 t | 20,070 t | 2,362 t | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland phosphorus, Dominican Republic or Portugal?
- Dominican Republic, at 18,511 t against 18,003 t in Portugal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland phosphorus between Dominican Republic and Portugal?
- 508 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Portugal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Portugal rank globally for manure applied β cropland phosphorus?
- Dominican Republic ranks 49th and Portugal ranks 51st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).