Dominican Republic vs Türkiye: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Dominican Republic
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 19,332 t against 18,511 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 821 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 56th and Türkiye ranks 54th of 200 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,348 t | 10,575 t | 6,227 t | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 4,800 t | 10,972 t | 6,172 t | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 4,024 t | 11,080 t | 7,056 t | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 6,492 t | 11,812 t | 5,320 t | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 11,038 t | 13,124 t | 2,086 t | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 13,889 t | 16,111 t | 2,222 t | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 17,708 t | 20,063 t | 2,355 t | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Dominican Republic or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 19,332 t against 18,511 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Dominican Republic and Türkiye?
- 821 t, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Türkiye rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Dominican Republic ranks 56th and Türkiye ranks 54th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).