El Salvador vs Guinea: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- El Salvador
- Guinea
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 4,298 t against 3,697 t in Guinea, a difference of 601 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Guinea's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 119th and Guinea ranks 121st of 200 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,014 t | 479.01 t | 2,535 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 3,582 t | 578.59 t | 3,003 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 3,332 t | 627.88 t | 2,704 t | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 3,250 t | 890.6 t | 2,359 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 4,072 t | 1,539 t | 2,533 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 3,682 t | 2,590 t | 1,091 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 4,301 t | 3,573 t | 728.09 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, El Salvador or Guinea?
- El Salvador, at 4,298 t against 3,697 t in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between El Salvador and Guinea?
- 601 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Guinea rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- El Salvador ranks 119th and Guinea ranks 121st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).