Eritrea vs Fiji: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus

Eritrea
1,082 t
in 2023
Fiji
1,032 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
147th
Fiji rank
150th

Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Eritrea
  • Fiji
2004006008001.0k1.2k196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 1,082 t against 1,032 t in Fiji, a difference of 50 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Fiji ahead.

Eritrea ranks 147th and Fiji ranks 150th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Fiji Difference Ahead
1990s 609.16 t 1,061 t 451.92 t Fiji
2000s 897.07 t 1,095 t 197.45 t Fiji
2010s 1,040 t 954.29 t 85.3 t Eritrea
2020s 1,081 t 908.53 t 172.45 t Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Eritrea or Fiji?
Eritrea, at 1,082 t against 1,032 t in Fiji as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Eritrea and Fiji?
50 t, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Fiji?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Fiji rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
Eritrea ranks 147th and Fiji ranks 150th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).