Estonia vs Tunisia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Estonia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 3,659 t against 3,025 t in Estonia, a difference of 634 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 126th and Tunisia ranks 123rd of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,633 t | 1,787 t | 3,846 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 3,457 t | 2,544 t | 913.12 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 3,298 t | 3,257 t | 40.92 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 3,118 t | 3,602 t | 484.27 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Estonia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 3,659 t against 3,025 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Estonia and Tunisia?
- 634 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Tunisia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Tunisia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Estonia ranks 126th and Tunisia ranks 123rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).