Estonia vs Yemen: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus

Estonia
3,025 t
in 2023
Yemen
2,656 t
in 2023
Estonia rank
126th
Yemen rank
127th

Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Estonia
  • Yemen
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 3,025 t against 2,656 t in Yemen, a difference of 369 t.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Yemen's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 126th and Yemen ranks 127th of 200 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Yemen Difference Ahead
1990s 5,633 t 1,174 t 4,459 t Estonia
2000s 3,457 t 1,850 t 1,607 t Estonia
2010s 3,298 t 2,435 t 863.29 t Estonia
2020s 3,118 t 2,660 t 458.18 t Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Estonia or Yemen?
Estonia, at 3,025 t against 2,656 t in Yemen as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Estonia and Yemen?
369 t, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Yemen?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Yemen rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
Estonia ranks 126th and Yemen ranks 127th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).