Ethiopia PDR vs Madagascar: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 11,989 t against 11,334 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 655 t.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 77th and Madagascar ranks 76th of 200 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,082 t | 4,665 t | 4,417 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 9,620 t | 5,378 t | 4,241 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 10,210 t | 8,274 t | 1,936 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 11,143 t | 8,704 t | 2,438 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia PDR or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 11,989 t against 11,334 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia PDR and Madagascar?
- 655 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Madagascar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Madagascar rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 77th and Madagascar ranks 76th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).