Ethiopia vs Peru: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 29,323 t against 23,720 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 5,603 t.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 43rd and Peru ranks 41st of 185 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,631 t | 16,958 t | 7,327 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 12,652 t | 21,608 t | 8,956 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 20,687 t | 25,869 t | 5,182 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 22,602 t | 28,736 t | 6,134 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia or Peru?
- Peru, at 29,323 t against 23,720 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia and Peru?
- 5,603 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Peru?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Peru rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia ranks 43rd and Peru ranks 41st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).