Ethiopia vs Sudan (former): Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 23,720 t against 21,372 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 2,348 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan (former)'s.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 48th and Sudan (former) ranks 50th of 200 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,631 t | 13,341 t | 3,710 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 12,652 t | 20,216 t | 7,564 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 19,088 t | 21,676 t | 2,588 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia or Sudan (former)?
- Ethiopia, at 23,720 t against 21,372 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia and Sudan (former)?
- 2,348 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Sudan (former)?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Ethiopia and Sudan (former) rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia ranks 48th and Sudan (former) ranks 50th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).