Guinea vs Latvia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guinea
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 4,619 t against 3,697 t in Guinea, a difference of 922 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Guinea's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 121st and Latvia ranks 118th of 200 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 947.09 t | 8,775 t | 7,828 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1,539 t | 5,189 t | 3,650 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 2,590 t | 4,900 t | 2,310 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 3,573 t | 4,837 t | 1,264 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Guinea or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 4,619 t against 3,697 t in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Guinea and Latvia?
- 922 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Latvia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Guinea ranks 121st and Latvia ranks 118th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).