Guyana vs Sierra Leone: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guyana
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 1,763 t against 1,675 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 88 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 134th and Sierra Leone ranks 137th of 200 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 551.65 t | 217.93 t | 333.72 t | Guyana |
| 1970s | 948.92 t | 272.4 t | 676.52 t | Guyana |
| 1980s | 563.42 t | 384.86 t | 178.56 t | Guyana |
| 1990s | 510.01 t | 472.04 t | 37.97 t | Guyana |
| 2000s | 1,024 t | 350.62 t | 673.75 t | Guyana |
| 2010s | 1,448 t | 1,081 t | 366.59 t | Guyana |
| 2020s | 1,721 t | 1,696 t | 25.52 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Guyana or Sierra Leone?
- Guyana, at 1,763 t against 1,675 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Guyana and Sierra Leone?
- 88 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Sierra Leone rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Guyana ranks 134th and Sierra Leone ranks 137th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).