Iceland vs Qatar: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Iceland
- Qatar
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 899.02 t against 769.28 t in Qatar, a difference of 129.74 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Qatar's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 155th and Qatar ranks 158th of 200 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 843.71 t | 2.89 t | 840.82 t | Iceland |
| 1970s | 904.42 t | 7.36 t | 897.07 t | Iceland |
| 1980s | 959.58 t | 34.82 t | 924.75 t | Iceland |
| 1990s | 964.77 t | 87.3 t | 877.46 t | Iceland |
| 2000s | 892.41 t | 121.08 t | 771.33 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 916.37 t | 315.53 t | 600.84 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 901.67 t | 692.38 t | 209.29 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Iceland or Qatar?
- Iceland, at 899.02 t against 769.28 t in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Iceland and Qatar?
- 129.74 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Qatar rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Iceland ranks 155th and Qatar ranks 158th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).